Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -CapitalCourse
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-11 19:09:13
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (749)
Related
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Judge throws out remaining claims in oil pipeline protester’s excessive-force lawsuit
- Exonerated murder suspect Christopher Dunn freed after 30 years, Missouri court delay
- Nicola Peltz Beckham accuses grooming company of 'reckless and malicious conduct' after dog's death
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Dunkin' debuts new iced coffee drinks in collaboration with celebrity chef Nick DiGiovanni
- Brad Paisley invites Post Malone to perform at Grand Ole Opry: 'You and I can jam'
- Families face food insecurity in Republican-led states that turned down federal aid this summer
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- What Kamala Harris has said (and done) about student loans during her career
Ranking
- Average rate on 30
- Shot putter Ryan Crouser has chance to make Olympic history: 'Going for the three-peat'
- Daughter of Hall of Fame pitcher Dennis Eckersley says she thought baby died after she gave birth
- Blake Lively Debuts Hair Care Brand, a Tribute to Her Late Dad: All the Details
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Inmate identified as white supremacist gang leader among 3 killed in Nevada prison brawl
- Black Swan Trial: TikToker Eva Benefield Reacts After Stepmom Is Found Guilty of Killing Her Dad
- 1 of last Republican congressmen to vote for Trump impeachment defends his seat in Washington race
Recommendation
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Georgia superintendent says Black studies course breaks law against divisive racial teachings
Olympic track & field begins with 20km race walk. Why event is difficult?
Massachusetts businesses with at least 24 employees must disclose salary range for new jobs
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
New Jersey school is removing Sen. Bob Menendez’s name from its building
Olympics gymnastics live updates: Shinnosuke Oka wins gold, US men finish outside top 10
Who Is Gabriel Medina? Why the Brazilian Surfer's Photo Is Going Viral at the 2024 Olympics