Current:Home > StocksSignalHub-Boston-area teachers reach tentative contract agreement after 11-day strike -CapitalCourse
SignalHub-Boston-area teachers reach tentative contract agreement after 11-day strike
PredictIQ Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 22:38:20
NEWTON,SignalHub Mass. (AP) — An 11-day strike by teachers in a Boston suburb ended Friday night after their union and the school district tentatively agreed on a new contract.
“We have great news for the students, families, caregivers, residents and educators of Newton. We expect schools to be open Monday,” the Newton Teachers Association said in a late-night social media post announcing the deal.
The walkout beginning Jan. 19 affected 2,000 Newton Public Schools instructors in about two dozen schools with some 12,000 students. It was the sixth teachers strike in the state since 2022 and the longest, closing schools for 11 days.
The union said it sought living wages for all employees and struck after more than a year of talks with the Newton School Committee, which negotiated on behalf of the district.
Union bargainer Ryan Normandin proclaimed victory at a nighttime news conference before cheering teachers who were bundled against the chilly weather.
“We taught our students not to be afraid that when those in power try to take away your rights, that they should stand up for themselves, that they should not do it alone, but together,” Normandin said. “We taught every other district in this state, what will happen if they try to balance their budgets on the backs of our students and educators.”
The agreement still must be approved by the school committee and the union members. Both sides were expected to ratify the deal this weekend.
The walkout sidelined students and prompted bitterness in the mostly affluent suburb of about 87,000 residents.
Newton parent Trevor Mack called the deal “long overdue” and “avoidable.”
“I don’t think there’s a single party that won in this strike,” Mack, father of an 8-year-old daughter, told The Boston Globe. The union and school committee “lost my trust very early on in their very negative tone and rhetoric.”
The walkout also proved costly for both sides.
In addition to salary losses, a judge fined the teachers association more than $600,000 for violating the state’s ban on strikes by public workers and on Friday threatened to double daily fines to $100,000 if no agreement was reached by Sunday.
The school district, meanwhile, was expected to spend an additional $53 million over four years to cover the new agreement, which includes a cost-of-living increase of about 13% over that period for teachers, pay hikes for classroom aides and 40 days of fully paid family leave time.
District negotiators said it also had racked up more than $1 million in court and other costs since the walkout began.
“This contract reflects our values including respect for our educators,” the Newton School Committee said in a statement.
“This strike has been painful for NPS families and the entire City of Newton. The Committee looks forward to the return of students to their classrooms,” the statement said. “We will take a breath, then begin the work of ensuring that this never happens again.”
By the eighth day of the strike on Tuesday, tensions had racheted up.
Parent Lital Asher-Dotan filed a lawsuit on Monday in Middlesex District Court. The Newton mother of three, including two high schoolers and a student in eighth grade, asked the court to compel the teachers union to end the walkout.
In the lawsuit, Asher-Dotan said one of her children is facing setbacks during a critical high school year that could jeopardize her chance of college acceptance. She said her children also have missed part of the hockey season and opportunities with the ski team club.
“The prolonged strike exacerbates these issues, especially for students with special needs,” the lawsuit said.
Other parents started an online petition urging the union and city “to continue your negotiations while enabling students and teachers to get back to the classroom.”
veryGood! (5973)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Trump’s EPA Pick: A Climate Denialist With Disdain for the Agency He’ll Helm
- Many ERs offer minimal care for miscarriage. One group wants that to change
- Rihanna, Kaley Cuoco and More Stars Celebrating Their First Mother's Day in 2023
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Meadow Walker Shares Heartwarming Signs She Receives From Late Dad Paul Walker
- Lisa Rinna Reacts to Andy Cohen’s Claims About Her Real Housewives Exit
- Big Win for Dakota Pipeline Opponents, But Bigger Battle Looms
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- How are Trump's federal charges different from the New York indictment? Legal experts explain the distinctions
Ranking
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- I'm Crying Cuz... I'm Human
- The FDA approves an Alzheimer's drug that appears to modestly slow the disease
- Therapy by chatbot? The promise and challenges in using AI for mental health
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- U.S. extends temporary legal status for over 300,000 immigrants that Trump sought to end
- Americans were asked what it takes to be rich. Here's what they said.
- Rihanna and A$AP Rocky Celebrate Son RZA's First Birthday With Adorable Family Photos
Recommendation
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
World Health Leaders: Climate Change Is Putting Lives, Health Systems at Risk
Hydrogen Bus Launched on London Tourist Route
Angry Savannah Chrisley Vows to Forever Fight For Mom Julie Chrisley Amid Prison Sentence
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Trump’s EPA Pick: A Climate Denialist With Disdain for the Agency He’ll Helm
Meet the Country Music Legend Replacing Blake Shelton on The Voice
How are Trump's federal charges different from the New York indictment? Legal experts explain the distinctions