Current:Home > InvestFastexy:President Joe Biden faces first lawsuit over new asylum crackdown at the border -CapitalCourse
Fastexy:President Joe Biden faces first lawsuit over new asylum crackdown at the border
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 21:42:59
WASHINGTON (AP) — A coalition of immigrant advocacy groups sued the Biden administration on FastexyWednesday over President Joe Biden’s recent directive that effectively halts asylum claims at the southern border, saying it differs little from a similar move during the Trump administration that was blocked by the courts.
The lawsuit — filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and others on behalf of Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and RAICES — is the first test of the legality of Biden’s sweeping crackdown on the border, which came after months of internal White House deliberations and is designed in part to deflect political attacks against the president on his handling of immigration.
“By enacting an asylum ban that is legally indistinguishable from the Trump ban we successfully blocked, we were left with no choice but to file this lawsuit,” said Lee Gelernt, an attorney for the ACLU.
The order Biden issued last week would limit asylum processing once encounters with migrants between ports of entry reach 2,500 per day. It went into effect immediately because the latest figures were far higher, at about 4,000 daily.
The restrictions would be in effect until two weeks after the daily encounter numbers are at or below 1,500 per day between ports of entry, under a seven-day average. But it’s far from clear when the numbers would dip that low; the last time was in July 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The order went into effect June 5, and Biden administration officials have said they expected record levels of deportations.
But advocates argue that suspending asylum for migrants who don’t arrive at a designated port of entry — which the Biden administration is trying to push migrants to do —- violates existing federal immigration law, among other concerns.
Biden invoked the same legal authority used by the Trump administration for its asylum ban, which comes under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. That provision allows a president to limit entries for certain migrants if their entry is deemed “detrimental” to the national interest.
Biden has repeatedly criticized Trump’s immigration policies as he campaigns, and his administration argues that his directive is different because it includes several exemptions for humanitarian reasons. For example, victims of human trafficking, unaccompanied minors and those with severe medical emergencies would not be subject to the limits.
“We stand by the legality of what we have done,” Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said on ABC’s “This Week” before the lawsuit was filed, saying he anticipated legal challenges. “We stand by the value proposition.”
Under Biden’s directive, migrants who arrive at the border but do not express a fear of returning to their home countries will be subject to immediate removal from the United States, within a matter of days or even hours. Those migrants could face punishments that could include a five-year bar from reentering the U.S. or even criminal prosecution.
Meanwhile, those who express fear or an intention to seek asylum will be screened by a U.S. asylum officer but at a higher standard than currently used. If they pass the screening, they can pursue more limited forms of humanitarian protection, including the U.N. Convention Against Torture, which prohibits returning people to a country where they’re likely to face torture.
veryGood! (7361)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- US Sen. Rick Scott spends multiple millions on ads focused on Florida’s Hispanic voters
- Former candidate for Maryland governor fined over campaign material
- Biden touts inhaler price drops with Bernie Sanders: Finally, finally we beat big Pharma
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Gone Fishing
- Governor says budgetary cap would limit his immediate response to natural disasters in Kentucky
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Gone Fishing
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Meghan McCain slams off-Broadway stage play about late dad John McCain: 'This is trash'
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Many allergy sufferers rely on pollen counts to avoid the worst, but science may offer a better solution
- 3 dates for Disney stock investors to circle in April
- Olivia Colman finds cursing 'so helpful,' but her kids can't swear until they're 18
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Did Texas 'go too far' with SB4 border bill? Appeals court weighs case; injunction holds.
- North Carolina lawsuits challenging same-day registration change can proceed, judge says
- Caitlin Clark wins second straight national player of the year award
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Judge finds last 4 of 11 anti-abortion activists guilty in a 2021 Tennessee clinic blockade
Man who used megaphone to lead attack on Capitol police sentenced to more than 7 years in prison
Judge finds last 4 of 11 anti-abortion activists guilty in a 2021 Tennessee clinic blockade
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
The Masked Singer's Lizard Revealed as 2000s R&B Icon
North Carolina lawsuits challenging same-day registration change can proceed, judge says
South Korean computer chipmaker plans $3.87 billion Indiana semiconductor plant and research center